
산림바이오매스에너지의 지속가능성 인증을 제도화하기 위한 전략: IEA의 관점과 유럽연합, 영국, 일본의 정책을 중심으로
© 2025 by the New & Renewable Energy
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Sustainable voluntary third-party certification for forest biomass energy utilization has become a focal point in the international discourse. This study analyzes the institutionalization of sustainability certification in major countries (the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Japan) and the perspective of the International Energy Agency to propose appropriate approaches for implementation. This study employed a comprehensive policy analysis and critical discourse examination to ensure objectivity. The research findings confirmed that voluntary third-party certification for forest biomass energy must incorporate multifaceted evaluation criteria, including environmental standards, supply chain considerations, socioeconomic factors, and lifecycle greenhouse gas emission parameters. For nations to integrate sustainability certification into their institutional frameworks, they must establish standards for voluntary third-party certification assessment criteria while ensuring procedural legitimacy and scientific currency through expert-led working groups. This study recommends linking certifications to subsidy programs to enhance their effectiveness. However, it is essential to pursue optimized approaches across the spectrum of complexity and simplicity, recognizing the potential conflicts arising from varying national conditions and certification system intricacies. In conclusion, a sustainability certification system for forest biomass energy should evolve into a dynamic framework that encompasses the current scientific knowledge and multi-stakeholder perspectives, serving as a procedural tool for evidence-based assessment.